Is Johanson Group good for SOC 2?

Potentially a good fit

Johanson Group is most relevant for teams matching its stated company profile of Not verified, particularly organizations in Fintech, Healthcare, and SaaS. Its listed framework coverage includes HIPAA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 1, SOC 2, and SOC 3, and the profile indicates compatibility with Drata, Secureframe, and Vanta.

That is a starting point, not proof that every engagement team has identical experience. Ask for the proposed manager and signing partner before you choose the firm.

Who should compare alternatives

Compare other firms if you need a geography outside Canada and USA, an unusually compressed report deadline, extensive readiness consulting, or a platform workflow not shown in the profile. Large regulated buyers should also test whether the firm has recent experience with reports reviewed by their customers and regulators.

A cheaper quote is not necessarily better if it excludes readiness, additional criteria, bridge letters, remediation review or extra evidence cycles.

Price and timeline

Current pricing signal: A written quote is required. Quotes are only comparable when they use the same legal entities, systems, locations, Trust Services Criteria, audit type and observation period.

Current timeline signal: No reliable public range. Ask the firm to separate readiness, observation, fieldwork, management response, internal quality review and report issuance. “Audit completed” can refer to several different milestones.

Platform and evidence handling

The profile lists Drata, Secureframe, and Vanta. Ask whether the named engagement team works natively in those systems, accepts exports, or requires a separate portal. Confirm who owns requests, how exceptions are documented, and whether you can export the complete audit trail.

If advisory or readiness services are offered, ask how the firm protects examination independence and whether a separate team performs the attest work.