Schellman & Company
A specialist assurance firm worth shortlisting when procurement scrutiny, multiple frameworks and a deep technical bench matter more than obtaining the lowest bid.
Compare leading SOC 2 audit firms by company fit, industry experience, pricing signals, timeline and engagement model. Our shortlist is organized by the buyer each firm suits best—not by brand recognition alone.
A SOC 2 examination must be performed by an independent licensed CPA firm. Confirm the signing entity, peer-review standing, proposed engagement lead and the boundary between readiness help and attest work before comparing convenience or price.
Editorial starting set from the published SOC2Market directory. Placement is not for sale and a listing is not an endorsement.
A specialist assurance firm worth shortlisting when procurement scrutiny, multiple frameworks and a deep technical bench matter more than obtaining the lowest bid.
A strong comparison candidate for teams planning SOC 2 alongside ISO 27001, PCI, HITRUST or other assurance work.
Often relevant to SaaS and technology buyers that want a specialist firm and a modern evidence workflow.
A useful candidate for growth-stage teams that value technology-sector familiarity and a streamlined audit process.
Worth comparing for buyers who want direct access to an experienced specialist team and a less layered engagement model.
A long-running information-security audit provider with extensive buyer education and broad assurance coverage.
A Top 100 CPA firm whose published SOC 2 service emphasizes CPA-led oversight, preparation clarity and report delivery.
Relevant when SOC 2 sits inside a larger cybersecurity, cloud or regulated-industry assurance program.
A comparison candidate for buyers who value a larger accounting firm and may need adjacent tax, advisory or assurance capabilities.
Often shortlisted by startups and SaaS companies seeking a firm identified closely with SOC examinations.
A full-service CPA option for Canadian organizations that want national coverage and adjacent professional services.
Appropriate to evaluate when a multinational customer, regulator or board expects a globally recognized network and budget is secondary.
Favor clear scope, a realistic Type I-to-Type II path, a named senior contact and a workflow your small team can sustain. A famous firm is not automatically the fastest or most economical.
Prioritize signing-partner experience, quality-control depth, customer recognition, complex system boundaries and the ability to coordinate multiple locations or criteria.
Ask for recent engagements with your regulatory overlay, data types and customer expectations. Generic “healthcare” or “fintech” marketing is not enough.
Compare how the firm maps evidence across SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST or other work without weakening independence or creating duplicate testing.
We reviewed the firms already published in the SOC2Market directory and weighted six buyer-relevant signals: licensed attest capability, public SOC 2 service evidence, fit detail, industry and framework breadth, platform workflow, and source freshness. We also compared recurring shortlists in independent practitioner discussions and 2026 industry roundups.
We do not treat marketing claims, partner badges or sparse anonymous reviews as proof of audit quality. Missing public pricing is shown as a written-quote requirement—not converted into an invented estimate. Final selection should use matched proposals with identical scope.
Sources informing the methodology: AICPA SOC and peer-review guidance, official firm service pages, independently hosted review discussions, platform partner directories and public buyer guides. Firm-controlled testimonials are treated as marketing evidence.
Tell us what matters. We’ll use your scope to build a relevant shortlist and help you compare pricing.